Asbestos Scare Leaves Hospitality Business Uninsured

2

The business was poised to provide bar services for the event scheduled for February 18 last year but was halted when authorities closed the park due to the health risk. The business argued that its BI policy should cover the losses through an additional benefit clause extending damage cover to customers and suppliers or via a prevention of access provision.

However, Suncorp, the insurer, declined the claim. The insurer highlighted that the policy contained an exclusion for contamination, which the claimant sought to contest by arguing that the contamination was the result of malicious actions. Despite this, Suncorp stated the claimant did not establish that the alleged damage happened during the policy period or “at the premises” of a customer or supplier.

The insurer further clarified that access to the claimant's premises was not directly prevented or hindered, and the park's closure was a precautionary measure due to community health concerns. Consequently, the prevention of access clause was not applicable in this scenario.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) reviewed the dispute and recognised that asbestos in the mulch may constitute damage. Nonetheless, they pointed out that the contamination could have occurred prior to the insurance period. The claimant failed to produce detailed evidence regarding the connections between their business, the park, and the event organisers. AFCA could not ascertain if the contamination affected premises related to the claimant's business dealings.

AFCA found no malicious intent behind the contamination, noting the NSW Environment Protection Authority conducted investigations, yet did not attribute the incident to deliberate actions. Without concrete evidence of malice, the policy’s contamination exclusion applied.

Ultimately, AFCA decided the prevention of access cover was not triggered since the claimant’s access to their own premises was unaffected directly by the park’s closure. Although the park's shutdown did occur within a stipulated 50km radius of the insured premises, the insurer relied on policy terms to deny the claim. This decision underscores the complexities businesses face in navigating coverage for unforeseen interruptions.

Published:Friday, 4th Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Rejects Traveller's Insurer Claim for Alternative Flight Costs 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel insurance policyholder faced disappointment as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) denied their claim for reimbursement of costs incurred due to changing travel plans amid threats of a pilot strike. The traveller, who rearranged his flights from Sydney to Vancouver and subsequently to Toronto, had hoped his insurer, AIG Australia, would cover the $5,576 expenses for the rebooked flights and additional accommodation. - read more

Fee Models Emerge as Solution to Cyclone Insurance Affordability Concerns 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The affordability of cyclone insurance in Australia’s high-risk zones remains a pressing issue, prompting some brokers to shift towards fee-based models. This change is highlighted in the latest annual review of the cyclone reinsurance pool from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). - read more

Homeowner's Storm Damage Claim Denied; Faulty Construction Cited 24 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A homeowner's attempt to secure a storm damage insurance payout has been thwarted after an investigation revealed that the damage was due to poor maintenance and faulty construction, rather than extreme weather conditions. The initial claim attributed the damage on the property's western wall and roof eaves to significant rainfall, citing a substantial 141mm in July, with a notable record of 43.6mm in a single day. - read more

NSW Workers’ Compensation Scheme Faces Major Overhaul Amid Underinsurance Issues 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) has identified critical issues of underinsurance and employer non-compliance within the icare workers’ compensation scheme. A recent review highlighted that over $60 million in premiums were not collected due to missing wage declarations, with about 75% of employers audited showing non-compliance responsible for an additional $24.5 million in unpaid premiums. - read more

Insurer Prevails in Vehicle Value Dispute 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a protest from a car owner against her insurer, RAC Insurance, regarding the reduction of her vehicle's agreed value has been dismissed. The case arose after the complainant made a total loss claim following an accident in October, only to discover that her vehicle's value had been adjusted down to $29,700 from a previous total of $40,000. - read more